Managed care · Payor-provider · Insurer disputes

Healthcare litigation with commercial judgment.

Healthcare remains a core strength of The Zorkin Firm. The firm represents managed care plans, insurers, and business clients in provider disputes, contract disputes, reimbursement matters, regulatory issues, administrative proceedings, and related civil litigation.

Core capabilities

Subject-matter fluency for complex managed care and payment disputes.

The firm brings commercial litigation strategy to disputes involving managed care, insurance, provider relationships, reimbursement, regulatory obligations, and healthcare business risk.

01

Health plan and insurer litigation

Provider disputes, contract claims, ERISA and bad-faith actions, administrative hearings, government investigations, and member litigation.

02

Payor-provider and reimbursement disputes

Out-of-network providers, payment methodologies, emergency services, hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, specialty practices, pharmacies, and air ambulance claims.

03

Healthcare laws and regulations

Managed care issues involving the Knox-Keene Act, California Insurance Code, ERISA, FEHBA, HIPAA, Medicare Act, and No Surprises Act.

Selected experience

Trial, arbitration, dispositive motions, and negotiated resolution.

Representative matters include a unanimous jury verdict, defense arbitration awards, summary judgment, demurrers without leave to amend, and negotiated dismissals or settlements in healthcare payment and member disputes.

Jury verdict

Out-of-network neurosurgery dispute

Obtained a unanimous defense verdict for a major California health plan and established that the provider was properly paid.

Summary judgment

Pharmacy underpayment claims

Obtained summary judgment on contract and fraud claims seeking $40 million in alleged underpayments.

Arbitration

Hospital payment disputes

Obtained defense judgments for major California health plans in hospital-system and Los Angeles hospital arbitrations.

Preemption

Air ambulance claims

Obtained an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend on federal preemption grounds.

Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any future matter.

Supporting resource

No Surprises Act and Federal IDR.

The No Surprises Act remains relevant to certain healthcare payment disputes, but it is one component of the firm’s broader healthcare litigation practice.

No Surprises Act resource

Commercial perspective

Healthcare matters may involve overlapping contract, fraud, statutory, administrative, preemption, reimbursement, and business issues. The firm’s broader commercial litigation practice supports a unified strategy.

Commercial litigation overview

Direct answers

Frequently asked questions.

These answers are general information, not legal advice. The analysis of a specific matter depends on its facts, law, forum, and objectives.

What healthcare litigation does The Zorkin Firm handle?

The firm handles managed care, health plan, insurer, provider, reimbursement, contract, ERISA, bad-faith, administrative, regulatory, and related civil disputes.

Does the firm handle out-of-network provider disputes?

Yes. The firm has handled matters involving out-of-network neurosurgery practices, orthopedic surgeons, pharmacies, hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, emergency services, and air ambulance providers.

What healthcare laws are relevant to the firm’s practice?

Depending on the matter, relevant law may include the Knox-Keene Act, California Insurance Code, ERISA, FEHBA, HIPAA, Medicare Act, No Surprises Act, contract law, preemption principles, and procedural rules.

Does the firm handle No Surprises Act matters?

Yes. The No Surprises Act remains part of the firm’s healthcare and reimbursement experience. The website maintains a separate resource page for federal IDR and related payment-dispute issues.

Contact The Zorkin Firm

Does the dispute require senior litigation judgment?

Contact the firm to discuss the parties, general nature of the matter, business objective, and next step. Do not send confidential information before an engagement is confirmed.

Request a conflict check (323) 493-8075